我有以下类,它是
IDisposable
对象的装饰器(我省略了它添加的内容),它本身使用通用模式实现 IDisposable
:
public class DisposableDecorator : IDisposable
{
private readonly IDisposable _innerDisposable;
public DisposableDecorator(IDisposable innerDisposable)
{
_innerDisposable = innerDisposable;
}
#region IDisposable Members
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
#endregion
~DisposableDecorator()
{
Dispose(false);
}
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposing)
_innerDisposable.Dispose();
}
}
我可以轻松测试当调用
innerDisposable
时 Dispose()
是否被释放:
[Test]
public void Dispose__DisposesInnerDisposable()
{
var mockInnerDisposable = new Mock<IDisposable>();
new DisposableDecorator(mockInnerDisposable.Object).Dispose();
mockInnerDisposable.Verify(x => x.Dispose());
}
但是我如何编写一个测试来确保
innerDisposable
是否被终结器处理?我想写这样的东西,但它失败了,大概是因为GC线程还没有调用终结器:
[Test]
public void Finalizer__DoesNotDisposeInnerDisposable()
{
var mockInnerDisposable = new Mock<IDisposable>();
new DisposableDecorator(mockInnerDisposable.Object);
GC.Collect();
mockInnerDisposable.Verify(x => x.Dispose(), Times.Never());
}
不幸的是,
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();不能帮助我测试终结器。
[Test]
public void TestTemporaryFile_without_Dispose()
{
const string DOMAIN_NAME = "testDomain";
const string FILENAME_KEY = "fileName";
string testRoot = Directory.GetCurrentDirectory();
AppDomainSetup info = new AppDomainSetup
{
ApplicationBase = testRoot
};
AppDomain testDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain(DOMAIN_NAME, null, info);
testDomain.DoCallBack(delegate
{
TemporaryFile temporaryFile = new TemporaryFile();
Assert.IsTrue(File.Exists(temporaryFile.FileName));
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData(FILENAME_KEY, temporaryFile.FileName);
});
string createdTemporaryFileName = (string)testDomain.GetData(FILENAME_KEY);
Assert.IsTrue(File.Exists(createdTemporaryFileName));
AppDomain.Unload(testDomain);
Assert.IsFalse(File.Exists(createdTemporaryFileName));
}
这可以通过弱引用来完成。
在测试中,在调用 GC.Collect() 之前让局部变量超出范围非常重要。确保的最简单方法是函数作用域。
class Stuff
{
~Stuff()
{
}
}
WeakReference CreateWithWeakReference<T>(Func<T> factory)
{
return new WeakReference(factory());
}
[Test]
public void TestEverythingOutOfScopeIsReleased()
{
var tracked = new List<WeakReference>();
var referer = new List<Stuff>();
tracked.Add(CreateWithWeakReference(() => { var stuff = new Stuff(); referer.Add(stuff); return stuff; }));
// Run some code that is expected to release the references
referer.Clear();
GC.Collect();
Assert.IsFalse(tracked.Any(o => o.IsAlive), "All objects should have been released");
}
[Test]
public void TestLocalVariableIsStillInScope()
{
var tracked = new List<WeakReference>();
var referer = new List<Stuff>();
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
var stuff = new Stuff();
tracked.Add(CreateWithWeakReference(() => { referer.Add(stuff); return stuff; }));
}
// Run some code that is expected to release the references
referer.Clear();
GC.Collect();
// Following holds because of the stuff variable is still on stack!
Assert.IsTrue(tracked.Count(o => o.IsAlive) == 1, "Should still have a reference to the last one from the for loop");
}
var myObj = new MyType();
var finalizer = typeof(MyType).GetMethod("Finalize", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
finalizer.Invoke(myObj, null);