local tbl = {a = 1}
-- Passed and executed function
function tbl:handleFunc(x, y)
print(self.a + x + y)
end
-- I know the above code is syntax sugar.
-- tbl["handleFunc"] = function(self, x, y)
-- print(self.a + x + y)
-- end
-- Register event handlers that I can't control the call
Frame:SetScript("OnClick", tbl.handleFunc)
-- Probably called when an event occurs.
tbl.handleFunc(2, 3)
-- Then it will be like this.
tbl.handleFunc(2, 3, nil)
-- So I wrote a function like this
functin tbl.handleFunc(x, y)
local self = tbl -- This variable is too cumbersome
-- And this way, every time I call a function, I need to check whether the function definition is a dot (.) Or colon (:)
end
在调用函数时,在无法传递self的情况下,是否可以使用self?
如果没有,我应该如何设计?
[已解决]我使用翻译,但我想保持礼貌。谢谢您的答复。
避免不必要工作的一种方法是编写一个函数,该函数在将其注册为处理程序之前将为您包装该函数:
local tbl = {a = 1}
function tbl:handleFunc(x, y)
print(self.a + x + y)
end
function wrap_with(obj, func)
return function(...)
return func(obj, ...)
end
end
Frame:SetScript("OnClick", wrap_with(tbl, tbl.handleFunc))
仅使用调用实际函数的匿名函数
Frame:SetScript("OnClick", function(x,y) tbl:handleFunc(x, y) end)