是由于过度使用#pragma pack(1)
导致填充的原因?后台实际发生了什么?
#pragma pack(1)
typedef struct
{
union
{
uint8_t SAM;
#pragma pack(1)
struct {
uint8_t sm:1;
uint8_t sm1:3 ;
uint8_t sm2 :1 ;
uint8_t sm3 :1 ;
uint8_t sm4 :1 ;
uint8_t sm5:1 ;
};
#pragma pack()
};
}SAM1;
#pragma pack()
您的注释代码:
#pragma pack(1)
// from here on the compiler will align fields on 1 byte
typedef struct
{
union
{
uint8_t SAM;
#pragma pack(1)
// there is no use for this pragma on a bit field
// packing was already at 1 byte
struct {
uint8_t sm:1;
uint8_t sm1:3 ;
uint8_t sm2 :1 ;
uint8_t sm3 :1 ;
uint8_t sm4 :1 ;
uint8_t sm5:1 ;
};
#pragma pack()
// from the next struct or union declaration the compiler will use default packing
};
}SAM1;
#pragma pack()
// from here on the compiler uses default packing
“在看到编译指示后,Package在第一个结构,联合或类声明处生效。”
Paul Ogilvie的answer的附加:
#pragma pack()
重新设置为默认值。这甚至可能在某些结构中发生:
#pragma pack(2)
struct S
{
#pragma pack(1)
char c;
#pragma pack()
int n; // at default alignment!!!
};
#pragma pack() // without any effect, as set to default already previously
不过,您可以与push / pop结合使用:
#pragma pack(push, 2)
struct S
{
#pragma pack(push, 1)
char c;
#pragma pack(pop)
int n; // aligned by 2, as this was set previously
};
#pragma pack(pop) // setting back to what was set before first push in this example
有关更多详细信息,请参见:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/pack?view=vs-2019