有了量化约束,我可以得出Eq (A f)
很好吗?但是,当我尝试导出Ord(A f)时会失败。当约束类具有超类时,我不理解如何使用量化约束。如何导出Ord (A f)
和其他具有超类的类?
> newtype A f = A (f Int)
> deriving instance (forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a)) => Eq (A f)
> deriving instance (forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a)) => Ord (A f)
<interactive>:3:1: error:
• Could not deduce (Ord a)
arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration
from the context: forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a)
bound by the instance declaration at <interactive>:3:1-61
or from: Eq a bound by a quantified context at <interactive>:1:1
Possible fix: add (Ord a) to the context of a quantified context
• In the instance declaration for 'Ord (A f)'
PS。我还检查了ghc proposals 0109-quantified-constraints。使用ghc 8.6.5
问题是Eq
是Ord
的超类,并且约束(forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a))
并不意味着声明Eq (A f)
实例所需的超类约束Ord (A f)
。
我们有(forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a))
我们需要Eq (A f)
,即(forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a))
,我们所拥有的并不隐含。
解决方案:将(forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a))
添加到Ord
实例。
((我实际上不理解GHC给出的错误消息与问题之间的关系。)
{-# LANGUAGE QuantifiedConstraints, StandaloneDeriving, UndecidableInstances, FlexibleContexts #-}
newtype A f = A (f Int)
deriving instance (forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a)) => Eq (A f)
deriving instance (forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a), forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a)) => Ord (A f)
或更整洁:
{-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds, RankNTypes, KindSignatures, QuantifiedConstraints, StandaloneDeriving, UndecidableInstances, FlexibleContexts #-}
import Data.Kind (Constraint)
type Eq1 f = (forall a. Eq a => Eq (f a) :: Constraint)
type Ord1 f = (forall a. Ord a => Ord (f a) :: Constraint) -- I also wanted to put Eq1 in here but was getting some impredicativity errors...
-----
newtype A f = A (f Int)
deriving instance Eq1 f => Eq (A f)
deriving instance (Eq1 f, Ord1 f) => Ord (A f)