Python 3.7 BeautifullSoup soup.find 错误 - find() 不接受关键字参数
我从 URL 获得了以下 HTML： 我从 URL 中获得了以下 HTML： <h4> \r\n \r\n\r\n <a href="/l"> \r\n <!-- mp_trans_rt_start id="1" args="as" 1 -->\r\n <span class="brandWrapTitle">\r\n <span class="productdescriptionbrand">Mxxx</span>\r\n </span>\r\n <span class="nameWrapTitle">\r\n <span class="productdescriptionname">Axxxname</span>\r\n </span>\r\n <!-- mp_trans_rt_end 1 -->\r\n </a> \r\n\r\n </h4> 我正在尝试使用 python 来查找类名： import urllib.request from bs4 import BeautifulSoup url = "https://link" user_agent = 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.47 Safari/537.36' urlwithagent = urllib.request.Request(url,headers={'User-Agent': user_agent}) response = urllib.request.urlopen(urlwithagent) soup = response.read() product = soup.find("h4", attrs ={"class=": "productdescriptionname"}) print (product) Everythink 完美运行直到上线： product = soup.find("h4", attrs ={"class=": "productdescriptionname"}) 我收到如下错误： find() takes no keyword arguments 我不知道如何解决它 - 有很多信息，但没有任何作用：/ 在使用 BeautifulSoup 之前，您需要将其转换为 find 对象，否则它会使用 str.find 例如： soup = BeautifulSoup(response.read(), "html.parser") product = soup.find("h4", attrs ={"class": "productdescriptionname"}) print (product) 我认为这值得一提，如果 find 方法有问题，检查 type(soup) 是一个很好的方法来查明您是否正在使用正确的 bs4.BeautifulSoup 对象而不是 str。 我想在这里指出一件事，如果使用 soup.prettify() 使 html 可读。需要注意的是，.prettify() 将 bs4.BeautifulSoup 转换为 str。所以这应该单独使用，例如： soup = BeautifulSoup(response) # type(soup) --> bs4.BeautifulSoup print(soup.prettify()) # print readable html 不喜欢： soup = BeautifulSoup(response).prettify() # type(soup) --> str 我在网上读到的关于这个问题的另一件事是这样的：“你的 beautiful soup 版本可能不支持 find。”因此，我最终升级和降级了版本很多次，然后才意识到这是一个错误的陈述由业余爱好者制作。 在打印之前我已经为此奋斗了大约 45 分钟type(soup)。我希望这可以节省其他人的时间。 Может кому подойдет история такая повторял за автором ютуба и переписывал код для парсинга и вышла такая же ошибка как в вопросе искал читал, шерстил инет пока не начал перепроверять свой код в общем мой код с ошибкой: from requests import Session from bs4 import BeautifulSoup as BS from time import sleep headers = {'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/118.0.0.0 YaBrowser/23.11.0.0 Safari/537.36'} work = Session() work.get('https://quotes.toscrape.com/', headers=headers) response = work.get('https://quotes.toscrape.com/login', headers=headers) soup = BS(response.text, 'lxml') token = soup.find('from').find('input').get('') в чем здесь ошибка？ вот в этой строке token = soup.find('from').find('input').get('') а именно soup.find('from') я решил скать ошибку методом исключения поэтому довел до такого состояния и понял что в странице нет тэга '来自' а есть тэг '形式' как только поменял на тэг 'form' ошибка с soup.find() - find() ушла может кому поможет
我有以下html和css代码： html，正文{ 保证金：0； } #包含...</desc> <question vote="0"> <p>我有以下 html 和 css 代码：</p> <pre><code><!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> html, body { margin: 0; } #container{ width:100vw; height:100vh; background-color: green; } #left-bar{ position: absolute; width: 300px; height: 100vh; background-color: red; overflow: scroll; } </style> </head> <body> <div id="container"> <div id="left-bar" > </div> </div> </body> </html> </code></pre> <p>它给出： <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/sbXnw.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://cdn.txt58.com/i/AWkuc3N0YXRpYy5uZXQvc2JYbncucG5n" alt="extra padding overflow scroll"/></a></p> <p>左侧栏内有一个填充，我不明白为什么以及如何删除它。</p> <p>我尝试过的事情：</p> <ul> <li>在左侧栏上添加<pre><code>padding: 0;</code></pre>，它不起作用（也可以使用<pre><code>!important</code></pre>）。</li> <li>使用检查器来了解填充的来源。我没找到。</li> <li>删除左侧栏上的<pre><code>overflow: scroll</code></pre>。它有效，但我希望左栏具有以下行为 <pre><code>overflow: scroll</code></pre></li> </ul> <p><strong>如何删除左栏中的填充？</strong></p> <p><strong>编辑：错误用完全相同的代码消失了。</strong></p> <p>现在使用相同的代码： <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Ch1IF.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://cdn.txt58.com/i/AWkuc3N0YXRpYy5uZXQvQ2gxSUYucG5n" alt="no padding"/></a></p> <p>我做了什么：</p> <ul> <li>重启电脑，bug依然存在</li> <li>添加CSS代码来设置滚动条的样式</li> <li>删除我添加的代码 --> bug 消失了</li> </ul> <p>我不明白为什么...</p> </question> <answer tick="false" vote="0"> <p>您看到的是一个空的滚动条。设置溢出<pre><code>overflow: auto</code></pre>。仅当内容溢出时才会显示滚动条。</p> <p></p><div data-babel="false" data-lang="js" data-hide="false" data-console="true"> <div> <pre><code><!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> html, body { margin: 0; } #container{ width:100vw; height:100vh; background-color: green; } #left-bar{ position: absolute; width: 300px; height: 100vh; background-color: red; overflow: auto; } </style> </head> <body> <div id="container"> <div id="left-bar" > </div> </div> </body> </html></code></pre> </div> </div> <p></p> </answer> <answer tick="false" vote="0"> <p>您可能会考虑使用一个具有最小滚动条的插件（也许是<a href="https://grsmto.github.io/simplebar/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">simplerbar</a>）。还可以考虑只做 <pre><code>overflow-y:scroll</code></pre> 以获得更容易接受的外观。您还可以更改滚动装订线的颜色<a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/scrollbar-color" rel="nofollow noreferrer">colors</a></p> <p></p><div data-babel="false" data-lang="js" data-hide="false" data-console="true"> <div> <pre><code>var el1 = document.querySelector('[data-id=div1]'); var el2 = document.querySelector('[data-id=div2]'); instance1 = new SimpleBar(el1); instance2 = new SimpleBar(el2);</code></pre> <pre><code><script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/simplebar/5.3.8/simplebar.min.js" integrity="sha512-2SAzoBQi2FbvWkvcsoYW4PH478pUu0gwa7BRA6YQxg6kCWUIOIDfFHMLH57GbWeLa+pkYitOD5j9mIhIt3CLKA==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/simplebar/5.3.8/simplebar.min.css" integrity="sha512-uZTwaYYhJLFXaXYm1jdNiH6JZ1wLCTVnarJza7iZ1OKQmvi6prtk85NMvicoSobylP5K4FCdGEc4vk1AYT8b9Q==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" /> <div dir="ltr"> <div data-id="div1" style="height: 300px; width: 200px; padding:10px; display: inline-block; border:1px solid gray; background: lightblue; "> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p> </div> <section data-id="div2" style="height: 300px; width: 200px; padding:10px; display: inline-block; border:1px solid gray"> <p>Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?</p> <p>But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?</p> </section> </div></code></pre> </div> </div> <p></p> </answer> </body></html>