我在Google Cloud Functions上使用Puppeteer。
经过几次测试后,我注意到在Google Cloud Functions基础架构上部署时,我的代码平均需要大约56秒,而在本地测试的相同功能只需要13秒。
index.js
const chromium = require('chrome-aws-lambda');
const puppeteer = require('puppeteer-core');
const functions = require('firebase-functions');
exports.check = functions.https.onRequest(async (req, res) => {
const License = req.query.License;
browser = await puppeteer.launch({
args: chromium.args,
defaultViewport: chromium.defaultViewport,
executablePath: await chromium.executablePath,
headless: chromium.headless,
});
const page = await browser.newPage();
await page.goto('http://www.example.com', {waitUntil: 'networkidle2'});
await page.focus('#txtUserName');
await page.keyboard.type('testUsername');
await page.focus('#txtPassword');
await page.keyboard.type('123123');
await page.click('#btnLogin');
await page.waitForSelector('#ctl00_400_header_400')
//console.log("[✓]login successfully.")
await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#ctl00_400_header_400').click());
await page.waitForSelector('#__tab_ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim')
//console.log("[✓]Enquriy page loaded successfully")
await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#__tab_ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim').click());
await page.waitForSelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_rdvehicleSearchLicense')
//console.log("[✓]Claim section loaded successfully")
await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_rdvehicleSearchLicense').click());
//console.log("[✓]License tap loaded successfully")
await page.waitForSelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_txtclaimSearchPersonLicNo');
await page.focus('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_txtclaimSearchPersonLicNo');
await page.keyboard.type(License);
await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_btnVheicleSearchButtonClaim').click());
try {
await page.waitForSelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblErrMessage')
const textContent = await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblErrMessage').textContent);
res.status(200).send( 'Result => ' + textContent );
await browser.close();
} catch (error) {
//console.log("The element didn't appear.")
}
try {
await page.waitForSelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_grdClaimDraftSp > tbody > tr:nth-child(3) > td')
const textContent = await page.evaluate(() => document.querySelector('#ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_tabQuickSearch_vehicleSerachClaim_grdClaimDraftSp > tbody > tr:nth-child(3) > td').textContent);
res.status(200).send( 'Result => ' + textContent );
await browser.close();
} catch (error) {
//console.log("The element didn't appear.")
}
});
的package.json
{
"name": "functions",
"version": "0.0.1",
"description": "Cloud Functions for Firebase",
"dependencies": {
"chrome-aws-lambda": "1.14.0",
"firebase-functions": "2.2.0",
"iltorb": "2.4.2",
"puppeteer-core": "1.14.0",
"firebase-admin": "7.2.0"
},
"engines": {
"node": "8"
},
"private": true
}
使用已分配的NodeJS 8和2 GB内存部署Firebase功能。
如何改进我的代码以加快执行时间?
我认为任何代码都不应该像任何现代桌面一样在云函数中运行,特别是不像Puppeteer那样复杂(基本上运行Chrome),这并不是一件好事。
GCF仅为任何给定的服务器实例分配单个CPU。它没有GPU。 GCF适用于不需要繁重计算的简单工作。台式机通常具有4-8个核心(或更多)以及可帮助Chrome快速运行的GPU。在这两种情况之间实际上没有比较。
最重要的是,对于这段代码,你没有太多的东西可以加速它以符合桌面体验。