我用ida *表示8个拼图,我的朋友也用a *表示(同一距离的曼哈顿距离)。
[我计算了20个示例和我朋友的算法的算法平均值,我的算法的平均时间比我朋友的算法快得多,但是我访问的平均节点要比我的朋友多得多。
这怎么可能?有人可以向我解释我不了解的地方。
这是我的搜索算法
public Set<String> ida(Node startNode) {
visitedNodes.clear();
Node initNode = startNode;
int fValueMin;
/*fValueMin depth to run the program.
IDA* method being called iteratively until the depth reaches*/
for (fValueMin = initNode.getfValue(); fValueMin < 100; fValueMin++) {
visitedNodes.clear();
pathNodes.clear();
// Depth First search
Node nextNode = dfs(startNode, fValueMin, visitedNodes);
/*Verifying the returned is goal state or not. If it is goal the goal exit loop*/
if (nextNode != null && nextNode.equals(CommonConstants.goalState)) {
System.out.println("Goal state Found");
System.out.println("Nodes Visited:" + visited);
return pathNodes.keySet();
}
// System.out.println("Iteration:" + fValueMin);
}
System.out.println("Number of Nodes Visited:" + visited);
return null;
}
这是我朋友的搜索算法
private ActionSequence AStar(){
System.out.println("AStar Search Started");
boolean find=false;
QNode current;
do{
current=queue.removeFirst();
if(queue.size%1==0){
try{
BufferedWriter out = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(new FileOutputStream(FileDescriptor.out),"ASCII"), 32);
out.write("*********************************************************************************\n\n");
out.write("Queue: "+queue.size+" Depth: "+(current.element.depth+1)+" price: "+(current.price));
out.write(printState(current.element.state));
out.write("\n\n\n");
out.flush();
//out.close();
}catch(IOException gg){}
}
if(problem.Goal_Test(current.element.state)){
find=true;
}else{
if(current.element.action!='d'){
PSTNode up_child=Expand(current.element,'u');
if(up_child.state[11]==1){
tree.addNodeUp(up_child, current.element);
QNode up_child_qn= new QNode(up_child,null, null);
queue.addSort(up_child_qn);
}
}
if(current.element.action!='u'){
PSTNode down_child=Expand(current.element,'d');
if(down_child.state[11]==1){
tree.addNodeDown(down_child, current.element);
QNode down_child_qn= new QNode(down_child,null, null);
queue.addSort(down_child_qn);
}
}
if(current.element.action!='r'){
PSTNode left_child=Expand(current.element,'l');
if(left_child.state[11]==1){
tree.addNodeLeft(left_child, current.element);
QNode left_child_qn=new QNode(left_child,null, null);
queue.addSort(left_child_qn);
}
}
if(current.element.action!='l'){
PSTNode right_child=Expand(current.element,'r');
if(right_child.state[11]==1){
tree.addNodeRight(right_child, current.element);
QNode right_child_qn= new QNode(right_child,null, null);
queue.addSort(right_child_qn);
}
}
}
}while(!find);
System.out.println("*******************************founded*******************************************\n\n");
System.out.println("Queue: "+queue.size+" Depth: "+(current.element.depth+1));
System.out.println(printState(current.element.state));
System.out.println("\n\n\n");
return Path2Root(current.element);
}
IDA *反复打开搜索边界,因此将多次访问许多节点。尽管A *在BFS端更多,但取决于实现方式,您很可能只会在搜索区域中访问每个节点一次。这就是为什么IDA *访问的节点多于A *的原因。在运行时间方面,A *需要一些优先级队列来引导搜索,NLogN的复杂性就在那里。